Table of Contents
Reese's
World: Perspectives from the Editor
"Shooting
for Nicaragua"
Picture it: Independence, Missouri, fall 1988.
"Mom/Dad: Can I go to Nicaragua next summer?"
"No way! What are you thinking? That's a war-torn country.
No, foot is down, no."
"Can I go to Mexico then?"
"Well, ok, I guess."
The above was obviously paraphrased, but relates an experience
of mine that taught me well: always ask for more than you think
you can get.
Similarly, ever since we in the GLBT community have been demanding
marriage rights, suddenly every Democratic, and many Republicans
even, politician is for civil unions. Just a few years ago, every
politician, except for the most liberal Democrat, was against even
that. Howard Dean was seen as doomed politically for the rest of
his career because he signed the civil unions bill. Now, as full,
complete equality, not a second-class version, is there for same-sex
couples, suddenly civil unions are the 'obvious' way to go. Even
the Christian Coalition, the Christian Coalition!, has said that
"they
can't fight civil unions anymore" and they've lost that
battle, but marriage, marriage!, is not gonna happen on their watch.
Well, here we are going down the aisle. And who would have thought
that civil unions would even be de rigueur. So, rear back and get
ready, cause we ain't going back and we ain't settling for civil
unions anymore. And while I settled for Mexico back in the 80's
and it was wonderful and beautiful and I loved it, this time we're
shooting for the full enchilada, Nicaragua, in our fight for full
equality and marriage rights.
Reese Aaron Isbell, M.P.P. (Editor)
top
April Co-Chair's Report
Laura Spanjian
Greetings and thank you from your new Co-Chair!
At the Co-Chairs election meeting on March 22, almost 100 Alice
members elected Rich Kowalewski and me to serve as Co-Chairs of
the club for 2004.
I was elected to my first term as Co-Chair and Kowalewski to his
second one-year term. I succeed Theresa Sparks who stepped down
after providing outstanding leadership to Alice for two years. Theresa,
we will miss you! I hope to fill at least one of your shoes.
At the meeting, Treasurer Susan Leal, Supervisors Bevan Dufty,
Tom Ammiano and Aaron Peskin, Public Defender Jeff Adachi, former
Supervisor Sue Bierman, County Central Committee members Scott Weiner,
Robert Haaland, Michael Goldstein, David Campos and Bill Barnes
were among the elected officials who showed up to vote and mingle;
along with leaders from the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club, Noe
Valley Democratic Club and the Young Democrats.
As Co-Chairs of the Board of Directors of the city's largest Democratic
club-with over 500 dues paying members-we are eager to lead Alice
during this very exciting, yet challenging, time.
I know I speak for Rich as well when I say that the overwhelming
positive energy in the room the night of the turnout shows that
Alice members are more active and energized than ever. We look forward
to continuing our cooperation with the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic
Club on issues affecting the LGBTQ community, such as homelessness,
hate violence and gay marriage, as well as working together to help
defeat the divisive and war-mongering George Bush in November. Building
coalitions with other minority communities has set Alice apart from
other clubs and has helped make Alice one of the most influential
democratic clubs in San Francisco.
Not only do I want to work with Mayor Gavin Newsom and have the
club continue to be at the forefront of the gay marriage fight,
I also want to focus the club on electing more LGBTQ leaders, particularly
lesbians, in San Francisco. We haven't had a lesbian Supervisor
since Leslie Katz.
And with the recent news that Supervisor Gonzalez will not run
for District 5 Supervisor, I want to work hard to help elect a queer
Democrat for the newly open seat. Already, Robert Haaland, Jim Hammer
and Bill Barnes are asking Alice Board members for support.
I also want to continue to work closely with our LGBTQ mentors
and leaders: Assemblyman Mark Leno, Treasurer Susan Leal and Supervisor
Bevan Dufty. With their support, we can increase Alice's active
membership, resources and programming and expand Alice's influence
throughout San Francisco. I want to create a dialogue with some
of our LGBTQ leaders who recently have not had a relationship with
Alice. And I am excited to expand our relationships with our non-queer
allies. Mayor Gavin Newsom, Assessor-Recorder Mabel Teng, City Attorney
Dennis Herrera, District Attorney Kamala Harris, Public Defender
Jeff Adachi and Supervisors Aaron Peskin, Fiona Ma, Sophie Maxwell
and Chris Daly top that list.
Many of us worked very hard together in the past year, working
on Susan's campaign for Mayor, and then working to elect Gavin Newsom
as Mayor and Kamala Harris as DA. I will bring the same passion
and commitment to Alice in the year ahead, as I have in the past.
And I hope to continue to grow the many friendships and working
relationships that I have with many of you in Alice. Please feel
free to call me at #235-6048 or Rich at #552-4257 if you have any
questions about our goals for Alice or if you want to share ideas
for making Alice even stronger in 2004.
Here's to a great year of activism!
top
About
the Co-Chairs
For those of you who don't know Laura and Rich well,
here is some background on Alice's new leadership:
Laura
Spanjian has been active in the LGBTQ community since 1997 when
she started as Supervisor Leslie Katz's legislative aide. She not
only worked with Katz to fight the United Airlines suit against
the City's Equal Benefits Ordinance, but she led the early fight
to open the first LGBTQ youth homeless shelter in the Castro. From
Katz's office, she went on to be the Government Relations Director
for Muni and then went to work for the SFPUC.
For the last year and a half she has been working full-time (and
then some!) in the political arena. She worked on Bevan Dufty's
election to Supervisor of District 8. Spanjian then served as campaign
manager for Susan Leal's run for Mayor of San Francisco. In addition,
she just finished managing Assemblymember Joe Simitian's successful
bid for State Senate on the peninsula.
Laura has been Chair of the Board of Directors for Community United
Against Violence (CUAV) for the past three years, a member of the
Finance Advisory Board for Project Open Hand and a member of the
World Center Advisory Board for the Family Violence Prevention Fund.
Spanjian graduated Phi Beta Kappa from UCLA with two B.A. degrees
in Communication Studies and English and received a Masters degree
in Communication from Stanford University. She lives in Noe Valley
with her partner, Ellen Callaway.
Rich
Kowalewski has been active in the San Francisco community since
moving here in 1999. In addition to serving as co-chair of Alice,
he is Chair of the Board at the New Conservatory Theatre Center
in San Francisco and served on the board of the Gay and Lesbian
Victory Fund in 2002-2003.
While in Kansas City, Rich was a member of the board of the ACLU
of Kansas and Western Missouri, a board member of the MAINstream
Coalition (an interfaith non-partisan organization), chair of the
Human Rights PAC (a LGBTQ political organization), and a founder
of the Friends of Justice, which became affiliated with the Gay
and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation as GLAAD-KC. Kowalewski
served on the board of GLAAD-USA and helped broker the merger of
GLAAD-NY and GLAAD-LA which led to the creation of GLAAD as a national
organization with regional offices.
Kowalewski lives in the Inner Mission with his partner, Duda Silva.
top
On the
Mark in Sacramento
From the Desk of Assemblyman Mark Leno
Dear
Alice Friends:
The 2004 Assembly session is in full swing. Many important pieces
of legislation are being discussed and debated. I have introduced
a number of bills which I will detail here in the coming months.
But first, let me take a step back, and note the historic activities
of the last few months.
When Mayor Newsom told me that he was going to follow the state
constitution and not allow discrimination in marriage licensing
in San Francisco for same-sex couples, I immediately knew that we
were about to take a giant leap forward in the movement for full
equality, that this was the beginning of a new era in human and
civil rights, and that my newly introduced bill AB 1967 would be
a strategically perfect next step.
On the heels of my introduction of Assembly Bill 1967, the bill
that will prohibit the denial of marriage licenses by the State
of California to gay and lesbian couples, I was thrilled to have
spent Thursday, February 12th, Friday, February 13th, and that long,
historic weekend at City Hall personally officiating the marriages
of over 150 couples who came from all over the country. What a proud
and defining moment for our equal rights and for our City. San Francisco
has once again stepped out from the shadows of injustice by standing
up for the civil rights of all. The sense of excitement radiating
from City Hall that week was humbled only by the extraordinary displays
of commitment that hundreds of couples have made to each other.
I had the great pleasure of marrying my rabbi, my deceased partner's
Episcopal priest, many Alice members, community friends, and others
I've known throughout the years. The emotion we all felt during
those historic weeks was palpable. No court decision can ever take
that away from us.
Now we are on to the next steps in the struggle. As I mentioned,
I have introduced AB 1967 into the Assembly. This bill would amend
the state Family Code to define a marriage as between "two
persons" instead of between a man and a woman. It follows a
November ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court affirming
the right of same sex couples to marry. The Massachusetts high court
labeled the denial of marriage equality on the basis of sexual orientation
"arbitrary," and declared that the Massachusetts Constitution,
"affirms the dignity and equality of all individuals.and forbids
the creation of second-class citizens." The Court also "failed
to identify any constitutionally adequate reason for denying civil
marriage to same-sex couples." AB 1967 does not conflict with
Proposition 22 though our adversaries argue otherwise. The language
of Prop. 22 was to prevent California from being forced to recognize
the marriages of same-sex couples who were married outside of California.
(CA Family Code Section 308) However, that proposition did not change
the criteria for issuance of marriage licenses within California,
which is the subject of my bill, (CA Family Code Sections 300, 301
and 302).
Additionally, I have introduced a resolution, in my role as the
new Chair of the California Legislative LGBT Caucus, to make California
the first state on record opposing the proposed discriminatory amendment
to the U.S. Constitution that would remove the lawmaking authority
from states with regard to civil marriage. George W. Bush is now
on record as the first president to embrace codifying discrimination
into our constitution. Clearly this is a desperate act by a desperate
man.
I have much more to share with you regarding my many legislative
and political priorities in the Assembly. Over the next year, I
look forward to updating you further on these activities and more
via local events, community forums, and this column in the Alice
newsletter. In the meantime, should you have questions or thoughts,
please feel free to contact me at any time through my District Office
at 415-557-3013 or keep updated on the web via: http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a13.
Yours,
Assemblyman Mark Leno
California District 13
top
Alice B. Toklas
LGBT Democratic Club
2004 Board of Directors - Elected Members*
Alice Co-Chairs
Rich Kowalewski and Laura Spanjian
Treasurer
Scott Wiener
Secretary
Owen Stephens
Political Action Co-Chairs
Dan Bernal
Dean Goodwin
Fran Kipnis
Lea Militello
Issues Co-Chairs
Jerry Fuller
Rafael Mandelman
Lisa Williams
Membership Co-Chairs
Laura Kogen
Jay Shaffer
Luke Klipp (Youth Outreach Coordinator)
Public Relations Director
Rodney Clara
Finance Co-Chairs
Jeff Anderson
Michael Costa
John Lazar
* In addition to these 18 board members elected by
the Alice membership on 3/22/04, there are other appointed board
positions for which appointments will be made at the 4/26/04 board
meeting.
top
Dates with Alice
April 12 Membership Meeting at 7:00P at the LGBT Center, Room
300
City Attorney Dennis Herrera will discuss the litigation related
to the Mayor's actions to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples
and the constitutional challenge to Prop 22 (aka the Knight initiative).
Representing Assessor-Recorder Mabel Teng, Craig Dziedzic and Minna
Tao will discuss their experiences with same-sex marriage in San
Francisco and an analysis of the demographics.
April 26 Board Meeting at 6:30P at the State Office Building
top
National
News
1) Boxer Revisited
After hearing outrage and concern from many of us in the GLBT community,
receiving a letter requesting clarification from Alice, meeting
with the Human Rights Campaign in person in Washington, DC, meeting
via district staff with the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club, and
recognizing the grave concern we had over her statements back in
February regarding the same-sex marriages occuring at City Hall,
Senator Barbara Boxer has reaffirmed her commitment to the GLBT
community.
Senator Boxer issued the following statement: "I support full
equality for all couples, regardless of the gender of the individuals.
I believe that both different sex and same-sex couples should have
the same rights, protections, and benefits as well as the same responsibilities
under state and federal law. I understand that current California
law does not provide the full equality I initially thoughts it did."--
Senator Barbara Boxer
We at Alice are pleased by Senator Boxer's statement and her admission
that she was mistaken about California law. Now we want to get back
out there and support her re-election to the United States Senate.
2) Kerry vs. Bush Scorecard
on GLBT Rights

"George Bush, who promised to become a uniter, has become
the great divider. [Bush] proposed to amend the Constitution of
the United States for political purposes, and we say that he has
no right to misuse the most precious document in our history in
an effort to divide this nation and distract us from our goals.
We resoundingly reject the politics of fear and distortion."
-- Senator John Kerry
top
Reese's
Commentary
Commentary written in June 1996 during the federal debate over
legislation in Congress entitled the "Defense of Marriage Act"
(DOMA). At the time I was a skinny young 25 year-old thing, romantic,
desperate for love and attention, not yet to have my met my boyfriend-soon-to-be-ex-who-broke-my-heart-and-for-which-I-lost-all-interest-in-romance-and-love-thereafter
(so read it with your heart on your sleeve).
At that time I felt so personally touched by the marriage debate,
and became increasingly angered by the politics and the climate
and the debates, and wrote many a letter to many a legislator in
DC and in Missouri to state my concerns and anger. And at that time,
I wrote an editorial on the issue for publication in local Gay papers,
which inevitably didn't get published by any of them. But, as the
country goes through the debate in a new and exciting way, I've
been thinking about that article I wrote and what I said back then.
So I go through my old files from DC from the mid-90s, and find
my article, and it's below.
The Struggle for Marriage is Unique
I want to get married. Yes, I truly do want to get married. I
want to have all the glitter and trappings of a ceremony. My parents,
his parents, my friends, his friends, my relatives, his relatives,
our acquaintances, they will all come and participate in the joyous
celebration of the love that we have found. We will plan out a life
together and commit to that goal. We will be a married couple.
I used to scoff at the very notion of marriage. "I don't
want to get married," I used to say. "That's such a straight
thing to do." As a young college student, I believed in a more
"free" existence where I would float through life from
love to love, finding joy with several people. But I've grown past
those thoughts and, after many years of self-reflection and soul-searching,
I now realize that scenario will not work for me.
I have decided to search for that special someone with whom I
will feel comfortable and enjoy sharing the rest of my life. Maybe
that makes me sound pathetic, overly romantic, or even conservative,
but that is how I feel for my own life. Others can do what they
want, but for me, this is it. And in a way, it's rather a liberating
thing to conclude.
Now if I could only find the man. With gay men and women pushed
into isolated communities by the larger society, I have to contend
with meeting others through the bars, the dance clubs, specially
formed networks, or happenstance; these do not always provide substantive
situations. With the difficulties imposed by this scenario and gay
life in general, lifelong gay or lesbian relationships are especially
remarkable to me. I'm hoping to be one of the lucky ones who can
attain it.
I would say I haven't yet known mutual love. I've looked, longed,
watched, cried, debated, ignored, tried to ignore, joked, whines,
grown bitter, appeared nonchalant, and wondered when and why not
now. I've been a romantic fool wishing for love and flowers and
someone to fall for. I've been jealous and lovelorn. I've even been
depressed. Yet, I've survived and am surviving all of that. I've
learned to enjoy my life on my own terms. I've discovered my own
self. I've determined what I want for me. This is who I am as a
person.
Now the country is discussing the issue of same-sex marriage and
is delving into my personal life and determining for me whether
or not I have the right to get married. Everyone is debating my
ability to love, my ability to commit, my desire for its recognition
and legality, and my hopes for a union. Furthermore, everyone is
questioning even my capacity to contemplate the issue and determine
what is best for my own life. Well, I can make my own decisions.
I can determine if I'm in love or not. I can see if it's a relationship
that will last or not. I have the ability to commit to another human
being. Trust me to live my own life.
I have spent years determining what I want as an individual and
what I hope for myself. I have gone through a long process of self-examination
and determination. I have given this issue fervent thought. Yet,
I am given less credit, and legal standing, than an 18-year old
heterosexual who gets married on a whim. They will get access to
their partner's health insurance. They will get hospital admittance,
inheritance rights, and tax breaks. But, most importantly, they
will receive the societal acknowledgement and trust of their decision.
I will not receive any of this.
The debate over same-sex marriage is the most personal for me
of all the gay and lesbian rights efforts of the day and the past
because it reaches into the depths of my individuality and it rejects
my self. It denies the fact that I have thoroughly considered what
kind of relationship I want. It overlooks the fact that I have been
searching for a partner, and ignored all the difficulties that I've
encountered in that quest. It invalidates my ability to think and
love. It denies my personhood.
Previously, the struggles for gay and lesbian equality did not
really take our individuality into account. They always involved
attaining equal status as an official citizen who should have the
right to work, a home, private sexual relations, and political accessibility.
This gave society the ability to ignore my private life while possibly
accepting me tangentially.
However, this time the issue is not about separating my personal
life from the larger society. This time, the issue is not about
society treating me simply as a distant relative with whom it only
professionally associates. This time, it's not about my being just
the "gay guy" with whom they have to work or life. This
time, my personal relationship life is not being left at the door
as I enter the room.
This time, it is about my being a full-fledged person with a mind
and hopes and a desire for love and fulfillment. This time, it is
about the recognition that I have a life beyond the formal and official
ones, and that I should have equal legal and social status in this
arena as well. This time, it is about my being a three-dimensional
human being. This time, the discussion is extremely personal.
And that is how unique, and difficult, this debate is.
Reese Aaron Isbell June 12, 1996
top
We
Did It Once, And We Will Do It Again
Craig Dziedzic
Every member of the LGBT community will always recall what he or
she was doing on that "Holy Thursday" or "original
Thursday" when on February 12, 2004 he or she heard that the
City and County of San Francisco was issuing same-sex marriage licenses.
This coming week will be a month since the February event, which
will always be remembered as one of the most important achievements
for the civil rights moment in America.
As an employee for the City and County of San Francisco who works
as the chief tax counsel and director of policy and appeals for
Assessor-Recorder, Mabel S. Teng, I recall how the first four couples
were ushered into Assessor Teng's office and how the staff, friends,
and media were waiting in anticipation for the marriage ceremony
to begin. The atmosphere seemed very light and joyful; however as
Mabel Teng began to officiate the marriage ceremony for the first
couple, Phyllis Lyon, 79, and Del Martin, 83 , the mood turned quiet
and somber; and as the couple exchanged their vows, there was not
a dried-eye person in that room.
I also recall being deputized as a marriage commissioner by Nancy
Alfaro, Director County Clerk, and how City Hall in the days that
followed turned into a Woodstock of love with couples in long lines
encircling city hall. With the uncertainty of a number of pending
legal proceedings, I felt as if I was living in a small European
country on the eve of World War II with the threat of a Nazi invasion
at any moment in the day. In our situation, the Nazi invasion was
a court order enjoining the ceremonies. In response to such threat,
I felt that it was my calling to marry as many couples before being
told to stop. Others presumably felt the same way, since city hall
had an outpouring of volunteers from both city employees and non-employees,
working endlessly late into the evenings and over a three day weekend
to issue, officiate, and record the same-sex marriage licenses.
I must have married more than a hundred couples in practically every
area of the rotunda, including the staircase. Couples traveled from
as far away as Florida, Washington, D.C., Berlin, and Ireland. Although
each couple may have been different in language and culture, they
however shared a commonality in their ongoing love and devotion
for one another. I also found that in nine times out of ten, as
it had happened with Phyllis and Del, the giddiness of the moment
usually turned into very emotional and teary one as the couple joined
hands and look each other in the eye and exchanged their wedding
vows.
As the city continues to issue and record same-sex marriage licenses,
with the leadership of a very courageous Mayor Newson, San Francisco
should be proud to be the first city to stand-up up against discrimination
of same-sex marriages. San Francisco should also be proud that it
has nurtured and harvested its city elected officials to protect
and uphold the constitutional protected rights of its neighbors.
In our case, straight married couples are the heroes who protected
the rights of same-sex couples to marry who they please. Hats off
to Mayor Newsom who authorized the marriage licenses as well as
Nancy Alfaro who issued the marriage certificates and Mabel S. Teng
who recorded the certificates, along with Dennis Herrera who is
defending our actions.
It is difficult to predict how the courts are going to rule on
the pending court actions. Already other cities are following the
path of San Francisco. The LGBT community already knows that the
community is very vibrant and tenacious in fighting barriers of
discrimination. We have fought ongoing battles against racial and
sexual discrimination in the 60's and 70's as well as ones in the
80's and 90's involving HIV and Aids. Each of our battles against
social injustice caused a change in either creating new laws protecting
our rights or creating a greater social acceptance throughout the
country. We know that there will be battles ahead, and eventually
we will win the war because we did it once before, and we will do
it again. Craig Dziedzic Assessor-Recorder Mabel S. Teng's Chief
Tax Counsel
top
Alice
Membership Form
Alice B Toklas LGBT Democratic Club
1800 Market Street PMB#18
San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: 415-707-2010
www.alicebtoklas.org
Alice Reports Editor: Reese Isbell
General Membership Meeting 2nd Monday of each month
Month of April:
Monday, April 12, 2004
General Membership Meeting
LGBT Community Center
1800 Market Street @ Octavia
San Francisco, CA 94103
7:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
Join or renew on-line at www.alicebtoklas.org,
or fill out the application below
Membership Application
Yes, I want to join the Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club!
__$30 Regular
__$50 Contributing
__$75 Sustaining
__$150 Sponsoring
__$20 Special Needs
__Other
__I am renewing my membership __I
will be a new member
__I am a registered Democrat
Name ___________________________________________________________________
Address _________________________________________________________________
City _________________________________________State: ______Zip:
_____________
Phone: Day _____________________________Eve: _____________________________
Email: _________________________________________
Please send checks payable to Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic
Club and mail to: Alice B. Toklas LGBT Dem. Club/1800 Market
Street PMB#18,San Francisco, CA 94102
top
|